Irish Republican Army Part 01 · p.235
Back to search
·
About this set
·
Irish Republican Army Part 01
·
All files
Transcript
b6
ALLINFORMATION CONTAINED
b7C
HEREINISUNCLASSIFIED
DATE 09-28-2010 BY
StATE NOUSE BILL GRANIS SMALL INCREASE TOO
MUCH RERRESSION
House members would grant less than one forth of what is necessary for
welfare recipients to.meet the rising .cost. of"food, fuel; rent and tran--
sportation..
However, it forces recipients to work,for their checks under
substandard conditions, with no cn-the-job protection; it. would allow
r e
by prying into'their personal and family life..
Moreover, this' bill if
passed wouid constitute a gross violation of the human and civil rights
of welfare recipients:
THIS BILL MEANS THE FOLLOWING FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS
'I. RECIPIENTS MUST WORK FOR THEIR WELFARE CHECKS
A.
Any person recieving a welfare check. (with few exceptions)
would be forced to. accept any availabie employment. The
recipient has no choice' in the matter.
B.
tection especiaily those protecting women workers...
However,
or her allotment.
C.
Welfare. recipients would not be permitted to accept training
in skiils that wouid provide the best salaries, therefore.
'forcing them into work that is menial and 'substandard..
D.
While working for your check you must also show. evidence
Ifthis reauir-
ment is not met recipient will be cut from welfare.'
This'co-
uld mean showing evidence of from five to ten job searches
per week..
II.. .REDETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY
This Bill, though vague on how often redetermination of
eligibility should occur, leaves this matter almost tataily up. to
the,district welfare offices. It does. pass eligibility upcn the
recipient submitting him or her to frequent harrassment. and. re-
quiring information they might not possess.
EEI.
INFRINGEMENT UPON RECIPIENTS+ HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS
A.
This Bill, though would allow the Welfare Department to review ?
all personal records of recipients without having to have their
consent.'
B.
Irrelevant personal information must be. presented, not to
show need, but te harrass recipients.
C
The Bill would set aside $700.000: for the establishnent of an
FBI. type investigation apparatus.
This inves.tagatory practire
would openly violate. the law by forcing recipients to provide
information concdrning. their personal and -family life.,.
This'
upon naed, but wouid be used to harrass: recipients..
tended. to relieve the depressed situation of the. welfare recipient, but
to remove from welfare many who are now eligible and to. make those who
remain prisoners of the Welfare. Dxpeymxnyx x* Department..
It has
)rovisions that would go so far as to'place thousands of children into the
he rising cost of living.
PHILA. WELFARE RIGHTS ORG.
1231 N. FRANKLIN ST.,
F!LADELPHIA, PA. 19122
ALLINFORMATION CONTAINED
b7C
HEREINISUNCLASSIFIED
DATE 09-28-2010 BY
StATE NOUSE BILL GRANIS SMALL INCREASE TOO
MUCH RERRESSION
House members would grant less than one forth of what is necessary for
welfare recipients to.meet the rising .cost. of"food, fuel; rent and tran--
sportation..
However, it forces recipients to work,for their checks under
substandard conditions, with no cn-the-job protection; it. would allow
r e
by prying into'their personal and family life..
Moreover, this' bill if
passed wouid constitute a gross violation of the human and civil rights
of welfare recipients:
THIS BILL MEANS THE FOLLOWING FOR WELFARE RECIPIENTS
'I. RECIPIENTS MUST WORK FOR THEIR WELFARE CHECKS
A.
Any person recieving a welfare check. (with few exceptions)
would be forced to. accept any availabie employment. The
recipient has no choice' in the matter.
B.
tection especiaily those protecting women workers...
However,
or her allotment.
C.
Welfare. recipients would not be permitted to accept training
in skiils that wouid provide the best salaries, therefore.
'forcing them into work that is menial and 'substandard..
D.
While working for your check you must also show. evidence
Ifthis reauir-
ment is not met recipient will be cut from welfare.'
This'co-
uld mean showing evidence of from five to ten job searches
per week..
II.. .REDETERMINATION OF ELIGIBILITY
This Bill, though vague on how often redetermination of
eligibility should occur, leaves this matter almost tataily up. to
the,district welfare offices. It does. pass eligibility upcn the
recipient submitting him or her to frequent harrassment. and. re-
quiring information they might not possess.
EEI.
INFRINGEMENT UPON RECIPIENTS+ HUMAN AND CIVIL RIGHTS
A.
This Bill, though would allow the Welfare Department to review ?
all personal records of recipients without having to have their
consent.'
B.
Irrelevant personal information must be. presented, not to
show need, but te harrass recipients.
C
The Bill would set aside $700.000: for the establishnent of an
FBI. type investigation apparatus.
This inves.tagatory practire
would openly violate. the law by forcing recipients to provide
information concdrning. their personal and -family life.,.
This'
upon naed, but wouid be used to harrass: recipients..
tended. to relieve the depressed situation of the. welfare recipient, but
to remove from welfare many who are now eligible and to. make those who
remain prisoners of the Welfare. Dxpeymxnyx x* Department..
It has
)rovisions that would go so far as to'place thousands of children into the
he rising cost of living.
PHILA. WELFARE RIGHTS ORG.
1231 N. FRANKLIN ST.,
F!LADELPHIA, PA. 19122